Global pattern of earthquakes and seismic energy distributions Term Paper

Global pattern of earthquakes and seismic energy distributions - Term Paper Example Most of these papers have offered the evidence that chances are particularly limited for the seismicity to exist beyond 65 degrees towards the North. Additionally, the studies have pointed out that evidence is limited that the distribution of the released energy is limited to the zones, where maximum is considered to be the equator and other areas lying beyond 45 degrees north. The crucial question is whether these points hold relevance for events with magnitudes supposing magnitude 7. Importance of this study Since time immemorial, earthquakes have been ranked among the world’s most recurrent and devastating tragedies. Regions that have been most susceptible include the Asian countries, (especially China and Japan), the Caribbean, South America and Middle East. The recent events have seen other nations such as Turkey and Chile also ranked as countries prone to earthquakes. Even so, there are various insights that have been attached to catastrophes such as earthquakes. For ins tance, the severity of 2011 Japan quake can best be approached basing on the Steinberg’s insights on disasters. Steinberg (2000) focuses on how human economic and social forces turn natural events into calamities. Steinberg comes up with a compilation of a series of events that support his insights. According to him, events that culminate disasters are as a result of human decisions, such encouraging development on flood plains or in earth-quake ravaged zones, as well as attempts to divert river channels by using dams and dykes. Steinberg argues that responses to natural calamities do not work out effectively. They instead increase destruction and death, as well as social injustices. Stein erg elucidates how response teams eventual turn out to attribute the disaster events as the acts of God, when some people are to take the blame. Steinberg attributes the significant number of casualties in disasters to human decisions to desire economic growth, as well as decisions to provi de cheap housing in the disaster zones. Governments are concerned about the plight of property developers than those who would rent the property. Steinberg draws example from Earthquake that struck San Francisco in 1906. Government did not want to give impression of possible recurrence of the earthquake for fear that it would discourage the investments within the city. Moreover, the State did not want to fund scientific research and examination of the situations. Steinberg cited various recurrent catastrophes in United States, elucidating that the causes for the natural disasters, as well as their severity, were instigated by the human social, political and economic forces. Even pertinent give that globalization is deeply rooted, an impact of the earthquake in one areas has also an impact on other areas and this comes directly or indirectly. It requires contingency measures. Of course, contingency measures may only be effective once the dynamics of the Global pattern of earthquakes and seismic energy distributions are well know; hence, the importance of the subject. It also functions to demystify some of the notions attached to the seismicity. Focus of the Paper A typical approach to analysis of earthquake events is that which incorporates seismic energy, abbreviated as E, the number of earthquake events (N) on the earth surface along the radius, as derived